welcome to the fest
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

keith olbermann's special comment on bush
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sinfest Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mouse



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 17268
Location: under the bed

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:10 pm    Post subject: keith olbermann's special comment on bush Reply with quote

since i never watch network news shows, i have no idea who keith olbermann is, but i gotta say, i like the way the man thinks.

Quote:
Keith Olbermann blasts President Bush in his latest "Special Comment" section on Countdown tonight. He leaves no stone unturned…

Video-WMP Video-QT

(This was probably the most powerful special comment yet by Keith. If you would like, please feel free to use the Spotlight link below to help spread the word about this incredible commentary to others in the media)

Full Transcript:
And lastly tonight a Special Comment on why we are here. Half a lifetime ago, I worked in this now-empty space.
And for 40 days after the attacks, I worked here again, trying to make sense of what happened, and was yet to happen, as a reporter.
And all the time, I knew that the very air I breathed contained the remains of thousands of people, including four of my friends, two in the planes and — as I discovered from those "missing posters" seared still into my soul — two more in the Towers.
And I knew too, that this was the pyre for hundreds of New York policemen and firemen, of whom my family can claim half a dozen or more, as our ancestors.
I belabor this to emphasize that, for me… this was, and is, and always shall be, personal.
And anyone who claims that I and others like me are "soft", or have "forgotten" the lessons of what happened here — is at best a grasping, opportunistic, dilettante — and at worst, an idiot — whether he is a commentator, or a Vice President, or a President.
However. Of all the things those of us who were here five years ago could have forecast — of all the nightmares that unfolded before our eyes, and the others that unfolded only in our minds… none of us could have predicted… this.
Five years later this space… is still empty.
Five years later there is no Memorial to the dead.
Five years later there is no building rising to show with proud defiance that we would not have our America wrung from us, by cowards and criminals.
Five years later this country’s wound is still open.
Five years… later this country’s mass grave is still unmarked.
Five years later… this is still… just a background for a photo-op.
It is beyond shameful.

At the dedication of the Gettysburg Memorial — barely four months after the last soldier staggered from another Pennsylvania field, Mr. Lincoln said "we can not dedicate - we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract."
Lincoln used those words to immortalize their sacrifice.
Today our leaders could use those same words to rationalize their reprehensible inaction. "We can nto dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground." So we won’t.
Instead they bicker and buck-pass. They thwart private efforts, and jostle to claim credit for initiatives that go nowhere. They spend the money on irrelevant wars, and elaborate self-congratulations, and buying off columnists to write how good a job they’re doing — instead of doing any job at all.
Five years later, Mr. Bush… we are still fighting the terrorists on these streets. And look carefully, sir — on these 16 empty acres, the terrorists… are clearly, still winning.
And, in a crime against every victim here and every patriotic sentiment you mouthed but did not enact, you have done nothing about it.

And there is something worse still than this vast gaping hole in this city, and in the fabric of our nation.
There is, its symbolism — of the promise unfulfilled, the urgent oath, reduced to lazy execution.
The only positive on 9/11 and the days and weeks that so slowly and painfully followed it… was the unanimous humanity, here, and throughout the country. The government, the President in particular, was given every possible measure of support.
Those who did not belong to his party — tabled that.
Those who doubted the mechanics of his election — ignored that.
Those who wondered of his qualifications — forgot that.
History teaches us that nearly unanimous support of a government cannot be taken away from that government, by its critics.
It can only be squandered by those who use it not to heal a nation’s wounds, but to take political advantage.
Terrorists did not come and steal our newly-regained sense of being American first, and political, fiftieth. Nor did the Democrats. Nor did the media. Nor did the people.
The President — and those around him — did that.
They promised bi-partisanship, and then showed that to them, "bi-partisanship" meant that their party would rule and the rest would have to follow, or be branded, with ever-escalating hysteria, as morally or intellectually confused; as appeasers; as those who, in the Vice President’s words yesterday, "validate the strategy of the terrorists."
They promised protection, and then showed that to them "protection" meant going to war against a despot whose hand they had once shaken… a despot who we now learn from our own Senate Intelligence Committee, hated Al-Qaeda as much as we did.
The polite phrase for how so many of us were duped into supporting a war, on the false premise that it had ’something to do’ with 9/11, is "lying by implication."
The impolite phrase, is "impeachable offense."
Not once in now five years has this President ever offered to assume responsibility for the failures that led to this empty space… and to this, the current, curdled, version of our beloved country.
Still, there is a last snapping flame from a final candle of respect and fairness: even his most virulent critics have never suggested he alone bears the full brunt of the blame for 9/11.
Half the time, in fact, this President has been so gently treated, that he has seemed not even to be the man most responsible — for anything — in his own administration.
Yet what is happening this very night?
A mini-series, created, influenced — possibly financed by — the most radical and cold of domestic political Machiavellis, continues to be televised into our homes.
The documented truths of the last fifteen years are replaced by bald-faced lies; the talking points of the current regime parroted; the whole sorry story blurred, by spin, to make the party out of office seem vacillating and impotent, and the party in office, seem like the only option.
How dare you, Mr. President, after taking cynical advantage of the unanimity and love, and transmuting it into fraudulent war and needless death… after monstrously transforming it into fear and suspicion and turning that fear into the campaign slogan of three elections… how dare you or those around you… ever "spin" 9/11.

Just as the terrorists have succeeded — are still succeeding — as long as there is no memorial and no construction here at Ground Zero…
So too have they succeeded, and are still succeeding — as long as this government uses 9/11 as a wedge to pit Americans against Americans.
This is an odd point to cite a television program, especially one from March of 1960. But as Disney’s continuing sell-out of the truth (and this country) suggests, even television programs can be powerful things.
And long ago, a series called "The Twilight Zone" broadcast a riveting episode entitled "The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street."
In brief: a meteor sparks rumors of an invasion by extra-terrestrials disguised as humans. The electricity goes out. A neighbor pleads for calm.
Suddenly his car — and only his car — starts. Someone suggests he must be the alien. Then another man’s lights go on.
As charges and suspicion and panic overtake the street, guns are inevitably produced.
An "alien" is shot — but he turns out to be just another neighbor, returning from going for help.
The camera pulls back to a near-by hill, where two extra-terrestrials areseen, manipulating a small device that can jam electricity. The veteran tells his novice that there’s no need to actually attack, that you just turn off a few of the human machines and then, "they pick the most dangerous enemy they can find, and it’s themselves."
And then, in perhaps his finest piece of writing, Rod Serling sums it up with words of remarkable prescience, given where we find ourselves tonight.
"The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, prejudices - to be found only in the minds of men.
"For the record, prejudices can kill and suspicion can destroy, and a thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all its own — for the children, and the children yet unborn."

When those who dissent are told time and time again — as we will be, if not tonight by the President, then tomorrow by his portable public chorus — that he is preserving our freedom, but that if we use any of it, we are somehow un-American…
When we are scolded, that if we merely question, we have "forgotten the lessons of 9/11"… look into this empty space behind me and the bi-partisanship upon which this administration also did not build, and tell me:
Who has left this hole in the ground?
We have not forgotten, Mr. President.
You have.
May this country forgive you.

_________________
aka: neverscared!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kame



Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 2565
Location: Alba Nuadh

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This man is the Edward R. Murrow of this century.
_________________
bi-chromaticism is the extraordinary belief that there exists only two options
each polar opposite to each other
where one is completely superior to the other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
mouse



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 17268
Location: under the bed

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

so you're saying, i should maybe listen to him now and again?

well....i could be persuaded. what is the show he's on, and what network?
_________________
aka: neverscared!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marik



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 1234

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The speech on video
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kame



Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 2565
Location: Alba Nuadh

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

msnbc, oh, here's the youtube link to his rant.
_________________
bi-chromaticism is the extraordinary belief that there exists only two options
each polar opposite to each other
where one is completely superior to the other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Marik



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 1234

PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Haha, oh god, the conclusion is extra-scathing in context with what it preceeds --

Quote:
When those who dissent are told time and time again — as we will be, if not tonight by the President, then tomorrow by his portable public chorus — that he is preserving our freedom, but that if we use any of it, we are somehow un-American…

When we are scolded, that if we merely question, we have "forgotten the lessons of 9/11"… look into this empty space behind me and the bi-partisanship upon which this administration also did not build, and tell me:

Who has left this hole in the ground?

We have not forgotten, Mr. President. You have. May this country forgive you. Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad

Our coverage of the president's address is next! Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AfyonBlade



Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 681
Location: The Middle of Everywhere

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I seem to remember that during President Bush's first term, the media seemed to 'overlook' his inadequacies. Now, it seems that everyone is trying to ram home the point that he and the administration he chose sucks. I don't disagree, I think Keith Olbermann's right on the money. I just think it's a little late to be bearing down on the Bush administration now. Bill Maher was scolded like mad when he talked against the Bush Administration a few years ago...Hindsight may be 20/20, but it doesn't mean these people that are against Bush now were blind back then.
_________________
Knowledge is Power.
Power Corrupts.
Study.
Be Evil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Dogen



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 10792
Location: Bellingham, WA

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I just think it's a little late to be bearing down on the Bush administration now. Bill Maher was scolded like mad when he talked against the Bush Administration a few years ago...Hindsight may be 20/20, but it doesn't mean these people that are against Bush now were blind back then.


... so, we shouldn't blame the administration for being incompetent, or we should blame people for coming to their senses and changing their minds?
_________________
"Worse comes to worst, my people come first, but my tribe lives on every country on earth. I’ll do anything to protect them from hurt, the human race is what I serve." - Baba Brinkman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kame



Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 2565
Location: Alba Nuadh

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It takes at least 5 years for your general run of journalist to grow their reproductive organs back.
_________________
bi-chromaticism is the extraordinary belief that there exists only two options
each polar opposite to each other
where one is completely superior to the other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Amilam



Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 922

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you guys like Olbermann I would highly suggest watching him more as his ratings are not particularly strong. I'm still mystified why more of those towards the Left have not been able to rally around a Liberal leaning voice. I'm lukewarm on Olbermann, but I think the Left needs to find some representation and Olbermann is not a bad choice.
_________________
"And then the sea was closed again, above us."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marik



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 1234

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:11 pm    Post subject: people who do not find Daily Show funny have lost it Reply with quote

The 'liberal demographic' just isn't really into demagoguery and talking heads, so they don't seek representation in those outlets.

That's why left-wing 'counters' to radio and television 'personalities' do very poorly. The market for liberal windbags is downright skimpy, especially compared to the conservative market. The right end of the spectrum can host zounds of radio pulpit-pounder personalities, whereas the left can't even float Air America.

And that's Olbermann's curse, since he is essentially an on-air demagogue, spending a good portion of his time on savaging and ridiculing the other side. Whereas the right has a sizeable market of people who just eat that shit up (mostly old people; the median age of people who watch shows like O'Reilly is something ridiculous like 68), it just doesn't exist for commentators on the left.

The left has humor and satire. T'aint no funny-men on the right.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dr_destructo



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 90
Location: Salem, OR

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

classic
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
BoySetsFire



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 374
Location: Rex Kwan Doe enthusiast

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Keith Olberman used to be the main anchor on SportsCenter on ESPN. His usual co-host was Craig Kilborn.

Olberman left to do real news on MSNBC and Kilborn left to host the Late Late show on CBS.

classic stuff, that speech.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Darqcyde



Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 10557
Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BoySetsFire wrote:
Keith Olberman used to be the main anchor on SportsCenter on ESPN. His usual co-host was Craig Kilborn.

Olberman left to do real news on MSNBC and Kilborn left to host the Daily Show, then the Late Late show on CBS.

classic stuff, that speech.


Wink
_________________
...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
http://about.me/omardrake
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Dogen



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 10792
Location: Bellingham, WA

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 12:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Amilam wrote:
If you guys like Olbermann I would highly suggest watching him more as his ratings are not particularly strong.

Get me a Nielsen box and I'll set my PC to tune into Olbermann every episode. Otherwise it won't do him any good.
_________________
"Worse comes to worst, my people come first, but my tribe lives on every country on earth. I’ll do anything to protect them from hurt, the human race is what I serve." - Baba Brinkman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sinfest Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group