View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Darqcyde

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 11917 Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | In 1971, Roddenberry co-wrote and produced Pretty Maids All in a Row, his only non-Star Trek film credit, which makes up for the lack of intercourse in his other work by featuring lots of it. The film starred Rock Hudson as Tiger, a high school gym teacher who acts as sort of a guidance counselor to his young students, helping them deal with their issues by introducing them to his penis. |
_________________ ...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
https://www.facebook.com/O.A.Drake/
https://twitter.com/oadrake |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MerchManDan

Joined: 20 Nov 2007 Posts: 2126 Location: Somewhere else.
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Heretical Rants wrote: | OH NOES THOSE GUYS THAT MADE THAT ONE THING I LIEKD ALSO MADE SOME PORN EVERYTHING IS RUINED EVERYTHING | Being a regular commentator on YouTube, I've witnessed this happen. A maker of cute/amusing animations suddenly revealed a talent for making porn games (using the same characters, incidentally), and people lost so much of their shit, it was frankly stunning. An army of trolls could feed for a year off the angst generated. _________________
mouse wrote: | almost a shame to waste dennis' talent on him.
except it's always a pleasure to see a good dennis insult. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Heretical Rants

Joined: 20 Jul 2009 Posts: 5344 Location: No.
|
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can't decide whether it's hilarious or sad that they would even give a shit. _________________ butts |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MerchManDan

Joined: 20 Nov 2007 Posts: 2126 Location: Somewhere else.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sunember123

Joined: 12 Jul 2012 Posts: 185
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Succubus1982 wrote: | Heretical Rants wrote: | also everything else, probably
okay |
In essence Rule 34.... |
I wonder, if Rule 34 is true.. Is there porn of Tat? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Succubus1982

Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 919 Location: England
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
sunember123 wrote: | Succubus1982 wrote: | Heretical Rants wrote: | also everything else, probably
okay |
In essence Rule 34.... |
I wonder, if Rule 34 is true.. Is there porn of Tat? |
That is something I am happy to NEVER discover  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sunember123

Joined: 12 Jul 2012 Posts: 185
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now that I've mentioned it, somebody will probably make Tat's porn someday. Rule 35 and such.
Last edited by sunember123 on Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:57 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Arioch
Joined: 15 Oct 2012 Posts: 229
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Definitely! Tat should hurry to make a good porn ofhimself, before someone else would make a bad one  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Succubus1982

Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 919 Location: England
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Or Miss Magenta could do it, she seems to have no issue with graphic portrayals of characters so why not of the artist himself?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Arioch
Joined: 15 Oct 2012 Posts: 229
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, so the "Bad porn" team is numbered, would there bi "good porn"
"prior art" ?  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Miss Magenta

Joined: 09 Jun 2011 Posts: 3708 Location: Sinfest's Help Desk
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Holocauxt

Joined: 18 May 2012 Posts: 348
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
At this point, any normal man would be fearing for his life at whatever the Internet may spew forth from its utmost bowels...
...but I am no ordinary man. I patiently await whatever sick-fuckery you guys come up with. _________________ Opinions are like ass holes: everybody has them. Sometimes they're clean... sometimes they stink... and sometimes they're just full of shit. But if you love shoving yours up on other people's faces, then you're a fucking whore. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sunember123

Joined: 12 Jul 2012 Posts: 185
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Succubus1982 wrote: | Or Miss Magenta could do it, she seems to have no issue with graphic portrayals of characters so why not of the artist himself?  |
Nah, Miss M doesn't do NSFW arts. That means only Tat left. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bitflipper

Joined: 09 Jul 2011 Posts: 728 Location: Here and Now
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
sunember123 wrote: | Succubus1982 wrote: | Or Miss Magenta could do it, she seems to have no issue with graphic portrayals of characters so why not of the artist himself?  |
Nah, Miss M doesn't do NSFW arts. That means only Tat left. |
Miss M doesn't do NSFW artwork of which we are aware. I've raised a teen-aged daughter and I've learned not to assume; they are capable of infinite surprises.
BTW, Miss M, you may take that statement as a compliment. _________________ I am only a somewhat arbitrary sequence of raised and lowered voltages to which your mind insists upon assigning meaning |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Succubus1982

Joined: 07 Oct 2009 Posts: 919 Location: England
|
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Miss Magenta wrote: | Succubus1982 wrote: | she seems to have no issue with graphic portrayals of characters |
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha |
Is that sardonic laughter? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|