Sinfest :: View topic - Ought Comedians Tell Rape jokes?

Welcome to the Fest

FAQ

Memberlist

Usergroups

Profile

Ought Comedians Tell Rape jokes?
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14, 15 Next

Sinfest Forum Index -> General Discussion

View previous topic :: View next topic

There are some lines Comedians ought not cross.

Of course.

43%

[ 19 ]

No, nothing is sacred.

56%

[ 25 ]

Total Votes : 44

Author

Message

DeD CHiKn

Joined: 03 Aug 2006
Posts: 10229
Location: Baltimore, Maryla*gunshot*

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 2:22 am Post subject:

Dilbert has an eternal black mark since my local paper tried to put it in Calvin and Hobbes vacant spot.

Michael

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 11046

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:38 am Post subject:

And the author turned out to be a massive dick. Kinda makes it harder to enjoy...

WheelsOfConfusion

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 14004
Location: Unknown Kaddath

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 6:42 am Post subject:

Not only a dick, but he subscribes to the "expanding Earth" woo instead of accepting continental drift.

stripeypants

Joined: 24 Feb 2013
Posts: 4741
Location: Land of the Grumpuses

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:14 am Post subject:

WheelsOfConfusion wrote:

Not only a dick, but he subscribes to the "expanding Earth" woo instead of accepting continental drift.

Wow. I hadn't come across this gem of stupidity before. Scott Adams just gets better and better.

fritterdonut

Joined: 24 Jul 2012
Posts: 1437
Location: Hedonism

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:12 am Post subject:

Michael wrote:

And the author turned out to be a massive dick. Kinda makes it harder to enjoy...

Honestly I don't really care whether a director/writer/author/artist is a dick, it doesn't really impact how I feel about their work. Especially if they reveal their dickishness afterwards, because then I don't feel bad about spending my money on something that supports someone else's dickish behaviour. Case in point: Dilbert from 1990-2000, before Scott Adams created a blog and showed the world how idiotic he actually was. Also Clint Eastwood, until he started talking to empty chairs. Just because he's an insane republican who rants at inanimate objects now doesn't mean I can't enjoy Dirty Harry movies anymore.
_________________
Juke Joint Jezebel

WheelsOfConfusion

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 14004
Location: Unknown Kaddath

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:26 am Post subject:

stripeypants wrote:

WheelsOfConfusion wrote:

Not only a dick, but he subscribes to the "expanding Earth" woo instead of accepting continental drift.

Wow. I hadn't come across this gem of stupidity before. Scott Adams just gets better and better.

Actually, looking back on the post I saw years ago, it may have been tongue-in-cheek. But with Adams it's hard to say, because he's used that "it was just a joke!" thing to cover his ass several times before.

fritterdonut

Joined: 24 Jul 2012
Posts: 1437
Location: Hedonism

Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:10 am Post subject:

WheelsOfConfusion wrote:

stripeypants wrote:

WheelsOfConfusion wrote:

Not only a dick, but he subscribes to the "expanding Earth" woo instead of accepting continental drift.

Wow. I hadn't come across this gem of stupidity before. Scott Adams just gets better and better.

Considering he ends with:

Quote:

The expanding matter theory of gravity isn’t a serious one. It’s just a fun mental detour. And like all fringe theories, you can always find clues that make it seem as though it all fits together, so long as you don’t know too much about science.

It's pretty clear he himself doesn't actually believe it.
_________________
Juke Joint Jezebel

Thy Brilliance

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 3661
Location: Relative

Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:43 am Post subject: A goddamn hero.

You can tell exactly what type of person Scott Adams is if you ever read one of his books.

Darqcyde

Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 11860
Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.

Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:58 am Post subject:

fritterdonut wrote:

Michael wrote:

And the author turned out to be a massive dick. Kinda makes it harder to enjoy...

This is where we get back to the "voting with your wallet" issue. Sure Clint's a looney old man talking to chairs, but he's a looney old man WITH A BIG FAT CHECKBOOK talking to chairs. Where does he get his money from? Consumers. Well, sure it's technically studios and sponsors and what not who believe that his work (and his famed derived from that work) will attract consumers, but that's the point. It needs to be made known that his works won't attract consumers i.e. you need to boycott that shit.

And don't even try to give the whole "behind the veil of ignorance" weaksauce justification, because it's utterly morally vapid. Once you know what's behind the curtain you're automatically forced to make a moral choice. You either continue giving your support or you don't.
_________________
...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
http://about.me/omardrake

fritterdonut

Joined: 24 Jul 2012
Posts: 1437
Location: Hedonism

Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:39 am Post subject:

Quite obviously I am just a morally bankrupt person, because once again:

Quote:

Honestly I don't really care whether a director/writer/author/artist is a dick, it doesn't really impact how I feel about their work.

The best part is I don't even buy books/movies/games new, I only ever buy them used.
_________________
Juke Joint Jezebel

Snorri

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 10880
Location: hiding the decline.

Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:18 pm Post subject:

Darqcyde wrote:

fritterdonut wrote:

Michael wrote:

And the author turned out to be a massive dick. Kinda makes it harder to enjoy...

The problem here is that people hold many different views AND my support for one thing does not immediately mean I support everything all the persons involved in that thing stand for.

Clint Eastwood supports gay marriage. And he's a conservative with a few bad ideas. Should I boycott his films or not?

Hell, I don't think Eastwood is a bad man. I don't endorse all his ideas, but at the same time I can't seriously claim he doesn't deserve any of my money unless he changes all his opinions.
_________________

Dennis J. Squidbunny

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 3879
Location: AUSTRALIA YOU FAKIR

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 4:31 am Post subject:

I'm kind of confused, because seeing Clint Eastwood argue with an imaginary chair made me love him even more. Especially when his response to the whole thing was along the lines of 'well, what did they expect!'. He's fucking great. He can hotdog me any time. _________________ Once, at a local NOW meeting where I was the only male among about a dozen women, a feminism trivia contest was held. I came in third.

Darqcyde

Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 11860
Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:40 am Post subject:

Snorri wrote:

Darqcyde wrote:

fritterdonut wrote:

Michael wrote:

And the author turned out to be a massive dick. Kinda makes it harder to enjoy...

Well that's the thing: it all depends on how important their stance is on various issues versus how important that issue is to you. Clint didn't really ruffle a lot of feathers because he was generally just supporting a conservative platform.
_________________
...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
http://about.me/omardrake

Smooshie

Joined: 24 Jan 2013
Posts: 141
Location: NYC

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:05 am Post subject:

Darqcyde wrote:

And don't even try to give the whole "behind the veil of ignorance" weaksauce justification, because it's utterly morally vapid. Once you know what's behind the curtain you're automatically forced to make a moral choice. You either continue giving your support or you don't.

I don't know about that...
_________________
If at first you don't succeed [in persuading or explaining something to me], then try and try again.

I love you.

Darqcyde

Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 11860
Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.

Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 8:29 am Post subject:

Smooshie wrote:

Darqcyde wrote:

I don't know about that...

What does that have to do with anything? Refute what I said, add to it, or take it in a different direction. What you posted was a pointless link to a pdf that I'm not gonna waste time reading.

Simply put, you can't have your cake and eat it. You either uphold your morals or you make concessions. "But they're sooo talented, they're such a good performer, they are an asset to their craft. . ." is just making weak justifications about one's own moral compromises. Sure they may be minor, but at what point do they matter? How many small concessions does one make until they've completely gone against something?

Now I'm not saying paying the admission for the cost of a single Eastwood movie ticket or DVD automatically makes you a GOP'er for life, but if you stop and think about how you spend your money, where does it all really go (I bet there's political activist sites or some such that track this sort of thing)? Also like I said, it depends on how strongly you feel about the issue.

While this is a MUCH smaller scale, I would say this is the same reason why one should not invest in Phillip Morris, AIG, or Halliburton, regardless of how profitable and sound of investment choices they may be: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/10-most-hated-companies-america-163000649.html
_________________
...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
http://about.me/omardrake

Display posts from previous:

	Sinfest Forum Index -> General Discussion	All times are GMT - 8 Hours Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14, 15 Next
Page 13 of 15

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum