| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Yinello
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 2204
Location: Behind you
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 11:01 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Korladis wrote: | | Yinello wrote: | | This is perfect. Whenever some dude tells me that they were hunters in the stone age, I'll ask them to hunt me a steak in the supermarket. |
Dudes seriously tell you that? |
Well you know the whole cliche history she-bang. "Back in the past women gathered berries and cared for children and men hunted wild animals blablabla" I usually hear it as a lame argument why women can't do x (usually be a fully armored fighter in games or become a soldier in the army).
_________________
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if the woodchuck had a chainsaw? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Timpie
Joined: 28 Jul 2013
Posts: 54
Location: Mainland Europe - Belgium
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 2:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think those 'differences' would be more due to males having to have to fight off other males to preserve breeding exclusivity, rather then because they had to chuck a spear at an animal every few days.
_________________
People who are rather more than six feet tall and nearly as broad across the shoulders often have uneventful journeys. People jump out at them from behind rocks then say things like, "Oh. Sorry. I thought you were someone else." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Samsally
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 6011
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've heard that argument used to justify their own shitty behavior, too. "I couldn't help myself, it's wired into my lizard-brain." Lizard-brain being, I don't know, 'instincts' or something.
The only thing it serves for now is as a red flag for me to never take them seriously ever again and possibly keep the mace handy (you never know what they'll try to excuse as i-can't-help-it-insticts next).
_________________
Samsally the GrayAce |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darqcyde
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 9861
Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Timpie wrote: | | I think those 'differences' would be more due to males having to have to fight off other males to preserve breeding exclusivity, rather then because they had to chuck a spear at an animal every few days. |
Actually, yes and no. New research is showing that it depends on environmental stressors.
I mean, first off, the whole issue isn't that simple, I mean there's other things like mommy hormones that make one motherly and testosterone that does what it does, but that's off topic, and only one small part. It's really complex and a HUGE topic.
But back to what you're saying about "sex competitions". Judging by gonad to body size ratio, as well as sperm motility (how healthy the little guys are), scientists have come to find rough guidelines for how male primates will behave, whether more promiscuous or more monogamous. Humans are pretty much a mix and can go either way.
They've also found that external stressors influence male social behaviors to a high degree. Lots of stress, we're more likely to exhibit "ME ALPHA MALE ROWR!" types of behavior where as under low stress conditions we're all "Peace and LOOOOOVE, man, like groovy . . . " Again, while significant, these are influences, not hard fast rules, but they are significant, and can happen either with individuals or on large societal scales.
Whatever exactly the cause, it has little to no bearing on modern societies; someone SHOULD stay home with the young ones, there's just no longer a survival advantage to it being women as opposed to men, and even those are still not proved conclusively.
_________________
...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
http://12ozlb.blogspot.com Now in book form: http://amzn.to/14E6OFy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mouse
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 16519
Location: under the bed
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rune wrote: | | Hydro wrote: | Hmm, some of the coloring is a little off here and there. But hey, not bad for only two hours of coloring for me~
 |
Lens flare! Looks good. Good balance of warm and cool tones for a day-at-home strip.
Maybe add a dark corona around the spray bottle to mirror and contrast the light on the steak? |
i actually like it just the way it is. you will note that only percy is reacting to the spray bottle, pooch doesn't get why he's so upset. so it's not a universal evil (in the way steak is a universal good), it's just percy's personal antagonist.
if you wanted to do something additional to panel 4, you might want to do something to emphasize the different reactions. or not, of course.
_________________
aka: neverscared! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Korladis
Joined: 22 Sep 2013
Posts: 39
Location: SF Bay Area
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yinello wrote: | | Korladis wrote: | | Yinello wrote: | | This is perfect. Whenever some dude tells me that they were hunters in the stone age, I'll ask them to hunt me a steak in the supermarket. |
Dudes seriously tell you that? |
Well you know the whole cliche history she-bang. "Back in the past women gathered berries and cared for children and men hunted wild animals blablabla" I usually hear it as a lame argument why women can't do x (usually be a fully armored fighter in games or become a soldier in the army). |
That's a very simplistic and outdated view of prehistoric hunter/gatherer societies they seem to have. The idea that all hunter/gatherer peoples had the same gender roles is rather silly.
Unsurprising, given the source, though.
_________________
Signature things. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Leohan
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 937
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 1:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Awesome third panel.
Percy, can't you trust Tat just wanting to clean his windows?
_________________
Sinfest Juggalo Worshipper |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stripeypants
Joined: 24 Feb 2013
Posts: 2686
Location: Land of the Grumpuses
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2013 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Percy? Trust Tat? No, Tat is his mortal enemy!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enchantedsleeper
Joined: 16 Jun 2013
Posts: 131
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stripeypants wrote: | | Percy? Trust Tat? No, Tat is his mortal enemy! |
Except when he does head-scritchy. :3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ennis
Joined: 09 Jun 2013
Posts: 414
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Was anyone else considering it may have angel sparkles in it? That might mean Percy is part Sinfest-Evil and would explain his reaction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darqcyde
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 9861
Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| enchantedsleeper wrote: | | stripeypants wrote: | | Percy? Trust Tat? No, Tat is his mortal enemy! |
Except when he does head-scritchy. :3 |
No, no, no. To Percy Tat is part food bringer, part groomer, part general servant to whom Percy allows the privilege of serving him.
_________________
...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
http://12ozlb.blogspot.com Now in book form: http://amzn.to/14E6OFy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rune
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 954
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ennis wrote: | | Was anyone else considering it may have angel sparkles in it? That might mean Percy is part Sinfest-Evil and would explain his reaction. |
This interpretation makes me lol. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
