| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Wimbledon

Joined: 29 Sep 2006 Posts: 4 Location: <Funny location>
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:43 pm Post subject: 11/15 - Mischievous intentions! |
|
|
She's so cute and innocent looking, especially in the last panel! I hope she lets him down gently because I don't think my fragily psyche could take it if she was evhul!
and well, if she falls for him, then he can lay her down gently. you know, cause, hes a guy..and.. : ( _________________ The beatings will stop when morale improves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
recycled-bastard

Joined: 29 Oct 2006 Posts: 316 Location: Loserville, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...she looks like she's wearing those garden shoes.  _________________ Rock-N-Roll Soul Saver |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Van

Joined: 19 Aug 2006 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Heehee, I am also very interested in seeing where this goes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wack'd

Joined: 20 Oct 2006 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Agreed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tommysmo
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 3 Location: Albany, NY, USA, NA, WH, Earth...
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think we know where this is going. 'Nique's gonna show up and claim her right! _________________ Beer is your friend, if you let it be... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WheelsOfConfusion

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 11145 Location: Unknown Kaddath
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I sooo need a big, thick manuscript so that I can try this at the coffeehouse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donut3point5

Joined: 08 Oct 2006 Posts: 940 Location: The Bakery of Blood Gulch.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 2:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I love how much heroine is a homonym.
--donut3.5-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samsally

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 5315
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are there any other girls out there just -waiting- for Tat to draw a girl that looks vaguely like them in order to nerdily color it up nice and use it as an avatar forever and ever or is that just me?
^.^ I have faith it'll happen some day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yarko

Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm just hoping that some of his nude versions of these sexies get out into the general public.
| Quote: | | http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/homonym |
Techincally, "heroine" and "heroin" are not homonyms. _________________ The Truth is out there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xebra
Joined: 19 Nov 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm just curious if you, in any sort of technical sense, while hastily looking up the definition of a word you really should have already known – in order to point out meaningless errata that wouldn't be interesting or pertinent even were it correct (which it's not) – actually read the primary definition given in that link there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Usagi Miyamoto

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 2167 Location: wish you were here
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
mind _________________ The reward for a good life is a good life.
Last edited by Usagi Miyamoto on Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:29 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xebra
Joined: 19 Nov 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I actually dislike it when idiots do that, which is why I called him on it. I didn't, in fact, rip into Yarko for a spelling or grammar error. I ripped into him for incorrectly ripping into donut3.5 else for making a lexical error.
Recap
What donut3.5 said: "I love how blah."
What Yarko said: "Technically, not blah."
What I said: "Yarko, you are wrong for saying donut3.5 is technically incorrect."
What you seem to think I said: "ALWAYS blah IN EVERY CASE OMG."
So, yes, Yarko was wrong for categorically stating that heroin and heroine are not homonyms in a technical sense. I'm not sure what your lengthy argumentation is directed at, as I made no claims that any particular word is always pronounced like any other particular word. And no, "hear-oh-in" is not correct, any more than "nukular" for nuclear is. There's a pronunciation that sounds a bit like "hear-oh-in," but it's not common, in my experience. (Not that a secondary pronunciation in any way makes my original post incorrect.)
Thank you for your wishes of luck. If you are the best these forums have to offer, however, I definitely won't need it :P ... maybe a flame retardant suit ... or a retard retardant suit ... or a sense of proportion and humor ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rm

Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 4073
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
the primary definition says that homonyms are the same in sound and spelling, which the two words in question are not. _________________ ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Major Tom

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 7562
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| homophones |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rm

Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 4073
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
homophones only sound the same, homnyms both sound and are spelled the same. therefore donut was wrong and yarko right and xebra wrong and usagi both right and wrong. or something. _________________ ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|