| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which do you save? |
| The Human |
|
56% |
[ 23 ] |
| The Collected Works of Shakespeare |
|
43% |
[ 18 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 41 |
|
| Author |
Message |
thewaitersitsondown

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 2673 Location: The walrus was Paul
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I love shakespeare with all my heart, I think he is brilliant and I've thoroughly enjoyed everything I've ever read or seen by him. Moreover, he is an important link to the past, showing us that many of the same basic drives and ways of thinking that define us now were just as important hundreds of years ago. While so many works of literature from the same time period would show us how much we've grown and changed, Shakespeare shows us what things are eternal.
I would save the human.
Shakespeare is vitally important, and there are 7 billion people on this planet. I would rather lose one person and keep Shakespeare. It would be better. But I would not let the person die. First, because I would not be capable of it--one has to see a lot of death before one is capable of allowing someone to die, and I have not. It's easy to say that you would let the person die, but it would be extremely difficult to do without being very hardened or a sociopath.
Second, I feel that caring for and helping each other is one of those eternal human qualities, and it would be cowardly and stupid of me to give up that quality for proof of that quality's importance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cletusowns

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 496 Location: Oak Park
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nemini wrote: | The Collected Works of Shakespeare, of course.
I mean, there are 6 billion humans on the goddamn planet. And we are already growing too fast. So I will do humanity a favor AND save a cultural heritage of immense importance.
@cletusowns:
A human life is worth something? I think you are mistaken MONEY for HUMAN LIFE. MONEY is worth something. HUMAN LIFE is worth NOTHING.
|
And money is? Paper with no real value except what other people set it at? Gimme a break. Human life is the only thing on the planet with real value. How much money would you take to let someone kill you?  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mouse

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 15450 Location: under the bed
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well, that's just stupid. if you are going to let someone kill you, why would you want money? _________________ aka: neverscared! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cletusowns

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 496 Location: Oak Park
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mouse wrote: | | well, that's just stupid. if you are going to let someone kill you, why would you want money? |
Exactly. Life is always more important than money. Wanting to save a book over a human life is beyond moronic. Infact, I will go so far as to say that anyone who claims they would save Shakespeare is a liar and whoever said they would sacrifice themselves instead of burning a book needs to stop intellectually masturbating themselves over a book and get a grip. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mouse

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 15450 Location: under the bed
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ah, but the question was saving another person, not yourself.
and i don't say money is worthless - in fact, it's almost impossible to live without it. but if i have already decided not to live, i don't need money. _________________ aka: neverscared! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Major Tom

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 7562
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| however, i could sell the book... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lemontree

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 3297
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cletusowns wrote: | | and whoever said they would sacrifice themselves instead of burning a book needs to stop intellectually masturbating themselves over a book and get a grip. |
You men have your porn and magazines, don't take away my female right to masturbate over romance novels and whatever else is phoenetically stimulating. =b |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Teh Digital Dragon

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 1888 Location: THE WORLD OF LARNING.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anyone casting aspersions on Mr Shakespeare’s talent can just go and fuck themselves right now. I came to Shakespeare entirely neutral and…christ, some of his plays, they describe the human experience with such utter clarity and beauty. I’d go so far as to say I think Shakespeare’s works have saved people’s lives, and would continue to do so if I preserved the book.
So I thought about this seriously, but it has to be the human
There will be other great works, the same ideas will find form in print again, but that person will never be again, they're a one of a kind, and more importantly that person actually feels and values life, they're a person. The book is an object. I can live with destroying a beautiful creative work, I couldn't live with murder. _________________ "You cannot run away from a weakness; you must sometimes fight it out or perish. And if that be so, why not now, and where you stand?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Uncle Taylorbell

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 3191 Location: Northern England
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is the entire cannon of work influenced by and directly referencing or quoting Shakespeare gonna go, too? Because, after all, he's not just a great playwright, but also a cornerstone of Western psychology (no Shakespeare, no Freud, whatever your opinions on Freud it's a big loss), not to mention the English language. What about Ten Things I Hate About You? The poetry of Eliot? Rosencrantz & Guildernstern Are Dead?
Doesn't matter anyway, since all Will's good work was written by the Earl of Oxford ... (no, I don't really believe that). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lasairfiona

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 9614 Location: I have to be somewhere? ::runs around frantically::
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The ideas would have come from somewhere else then. I firmly believe that great leaps will show up no matter what. If one person doesn't do it, another will. Perhaps it would be better of the first person started the leap but the leap will still happen.
I'd save the human. _________________ Before God created Las he pondered on all the aspects a woman might have, he considered which ones would look good super-inflated and which ones to leave alone.
After much deliberation he gave her a giant comfort zone. - Michael |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Teh Digital Dragon

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 1888 Location: THE WORLD OF LARNING.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Asking what would happen if you removed all references to Shakespeare is like asking what would happen if you travelled back in time and killed Hitler. The changes he's made are so wide and subtle that the result would not be our world. _________________ "You cannot run away from a weakness; you must sometimes fight it out or perish. And if that be so, why not now, and where you stand?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Uncle Taylorbell

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 3191 Location: Northern England
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Teh Digital Dragon wrote: | | Asking what would happen if you removed all references to Shakespeare is like asking what would happen if you travelled back in time and killed Hitler. The changes he's made are so wide and subtle that the result would not be our world. |
I agree entirely, and that is why I think this 'hypothetical question' is complete and utter bone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Teh Digital Dragon

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 1888 Location: THE WORLD OF LARNING.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Most hypothetical questions are complete and utter bone, but I think we all understand the principal behind the practical reality of what we’re being asked. _________________ "You cannot run away from a weakness; you must sometimes fight it out or perish. And if that be so, why not now, and where you stand?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lasairfiona

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 9614 Location: I have to be somewhere? ::runs around frantically::
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Teh Digital Dragon wrote: | | Asking what would happen if you removed all references to Shakespeare is like asking what would happen if you travelled back in time and killed Hitler. The changes he's made are so wide and subtle that the result would not be our world. |
But I bet you that sooner or later a "Holocaust" would happen, some country would try to take over the world (only to be beaten by Russian winters), and a scapegoat would come to light that could be killed in every video game without guilt. _________________ Before God created Las he pondered on all the aspects a woman might have, he considered which ones would look good super-inflated and which ones to leave alone.
After much deliberation he gave her a giant comfort zone. - Michael |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Uncle Taylorbell

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 3191 Location: Northern England
|
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Teh Digital Dragon wrote: | | Most hypothetical questions are complete and utter bone, but I think we all understand the principal behind the practical reality of what we’re being asked. |
I understand, I just think the seeming constant raft of qualifiers offered by the author are an attempt to make us feel bad for selecting one option over another, despite anyone's earnest arguments to the contrary.
It's a baited trap of complete and utter bone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|