| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Secret
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 5429
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 11:53 pm Post subject: 1/29 Impure |
 |
|
_________________
| rm wrote: | | the grail is patient. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cixelsyD
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Poor seymore. He trys so hard to lead a good life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Twister87
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
The word-onomatopoeia strikes again! And an interesting parallel with the normal porn pop-ups and/or phishing sites. Do religion-phishing sites that lead to 'hot uncensored occult pagan action' exist? I'd be amused.
One final note, can Seymour's eyes get any bigger? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MellowFish
Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 755
Location: The Train to Gloryland
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think lil evil is responsible for this web page maddness. just look at secret's av. lil evil and his evil mac.
_________________
Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. -- Frederick Douglass |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Secret
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 5429
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's not a mac.
It's just evil.
_________________
| rm wrote: | | the grail is patient. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Twister87
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just when I thought Mellow's antics couldn't get any funnier, he has a slant at Macs, suggesting that they're evil. 1) You've obviously never used one before, 2) going along the evil line and jumping to corrupt, Windows is far far far more corrupt than Mac OS, and 3) actual Mac computers generally aren't housed in towers; more often they're complete with the monitor or one of those little minimac ones these days.
I'm still interested to know if there are any such sites as suggested in this comic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
filecore
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 931
Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: Location: PHP error in MySQL at line 46
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Twister87 wrote: | | Just when I thought Mellow's antics couldn't get any funnier, he has a slant at Macs, suggesting that they're evil. 1) You've obviously never used one before, 2) going along the evil line and jumping to corrupt, Windows is far far far more corrupt than Mac OS, and 3) actual Mac computers generally aren't housed in towers; more often they're complete with the monitor or one of those little minimac ones these days. |
Well I'd say that Macs crash a damn sight more often than their reputation would dare admit, I've seen a fair bit of kernel panic in my time. And they may look trendier, but I don't think the iMac/iPod/iWantToRuleTheWorld phenomenon is much better than Microsoft's approach. People like to MS-bash, including me, but that's only on the business/ethical side. XP is actually a fairly good OS, especially with SP2, although they seem to actually be going a fair way back towards ME with the new Vista. People let their bias prevent them from saying that they actually don't get very many XP crashes (unless they're an utter moron); I personally haven't had one for a couple of years now. Don't confuse an unstable OS with a buggy, badly-written third-party application which is, frankly, the cause of 99% of software crashes on Windows. My only real problem with MS is their bundled apps which aim to use their embedded technologies and try to prevent you from using third-party applications (especially for beginning or inexperienced users), but you can't honestly try and tell me that Mac OS is tremendously much better.
</rant>
:-) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Twister87
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh no doubt they've improved, I have to admit that XP is a far better OS than its predecessors, and that it is as user friendly an OS as Mac OSX is. My main problem with it is that it allows for viruses. Regardless of whether you have virus protection software or not, the fact that viruses are allowed to exist and work is the fundamental flaw of Windows and Microsoft. The company that myself and my dad work for, Cybertrust, wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for these flaws.
In which case it isn't so bad after all! 
</hijack> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phuemarley
Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 58
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
ummm....OT?
those laptop logos are grand. want seymour´s too! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kidcorona
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 83
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I may be naive on Macs since I don't have one, but why don't they get viruses?
________
medical marijuana dispensaries
Last edited by Kidcorona on Tue Feb 01, 2011 4:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Twister87
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kidcorona wrote: | | I may be naive on Macs since I don't have one, but why don't they get viruses? |
Basically, Mac OSX, which is UNIX based, doesn't allow for changes to the OS environment, whereas Windows does.
Last edited by Twister87 on Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:59 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PeteMoss
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kidcorona wrote: | | I may be naive on Macs since I don't have one, but why don't they get viruses? |
There are viruses on the MAC, just not as many.
http://www.macvirus.org/database
For years the reason there were so few is because the Mac computers did not have a large market share.
People that write these viruses and trojans didn't want to waste time writing something that would effect a minimal number fo people.
A lot of them are in it for numbers and mass confusion, what good is taking down less than 1% of all computer users (given that not all macs will be infected) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Twister87
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are those viruses for OSX specifically or for any OS in general? Because if you'll notice in the wikipedia article that I linked there's a table showing that there are a number of viruses for Mac OSs before OSX, but not for OSX.
I agree that the market is flooded with the PC over the Mac, and as a result, people will write viruses for PCs over Macs. But the fact still remains that it's virtually impossible for anyone to write a virus for OSX if they tried. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sam the Eagle
Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 2353
Location: 192.168.0.1
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Twister87 wrote: | Oh no doubt they've improved, I have to admit that XP is a far better OS than its predecessors, and that it is as user friendly an OS as Mac OSX is. My main problem with it is that it allows for viruses. Regardless of whether you have virus protection software or not, the fact that viruses are allowed to exist and work is the fundamental flaw of Windows and Microsoft. The company that myself and my dad work for, Cybertrust, wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for these flaws.
In which case it isn't so bad after all!
</hijack> |
<hijack>
'Crosoft has lot more viruses too due to the fact it's universally depised, along that they control a huge share of the market and do everything they can to corner more (althought I'm waiting to see what the EU judicial body will do to Vista). It feels better to some to buttfuck them than any other OS that currently exist.
</hijack>
That has me wondering. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot was Seymour surfing the web for in the first place?. 
_________________
我的氣墊船裝滿了鱔魚 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ups
Joined: 26 Jul 2006
Posts: 26
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Back on topic! Who cares about OS anyway!
I love the way that the ring (above the his head - sorry! can't remember the name in english) supporter is broken!
Also, the red cheeks while trying to delete the content. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
welcome to the fest
FAQ 
Search 
Memberlist 
Usergroups
Register
Profile 
Log in to check your private messages 
Log in 
