| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mr Gary

Joined: 30 Apr 2009 Posts: 6164 Location: Some pub in England
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've often been thanked for ingesting my own balls, but you're welcome anyway. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Usagi Miyamoto

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 2165 Location: wish you were here
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jinx

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 3522 Location: America, fuck yeah!
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Homosexual stabbing rape, at its finest! _________________ The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.
- Charles Darwin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LD!

Joined: 11 Nov 2006 Posts: 1140 Location: Just west of the Atlantic
|
Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Do you mean that because they're gay or because there is only one sex involved? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Usagi Miyamoto

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 2165 Location: wish you were here
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
_________________ The reward for a good life is a good life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WheelsOfConfusion

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 11134 Location: Unknown Kaddath
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mouse

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 15446 Location: under the bed
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
the voyagers make me happy on many levels, not least because they keep finding new stuff. _________________ aka: neverscared! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WheelsOfConfusion

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 11134 Location: Unknown Kaddath
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WheelsOfConfusion

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 11134 Location: Unknown Kaddath
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
picturesofsky

Joined: 13 May 2008 Posts: 3074 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read that whole article. _________________ Ironically, Halen's one of the few people here I wouldn't worry about terrifying my friends and family. In my head he ends every real life conversation stroking his chin and saying, "well yes, that sounds reasonable." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mouse

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 15446 Location: under the bed
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
is that really evolution, though, or just strong selection? it looks like there aren't new variants created, just the best variants (given the presence of the drug) come to dominate the 'population'.
maybe it's my definition of evolution - i consider true evolution involves a continually changing gene pool, not just pressures that select from that gene pool. you need both of them, to see a true change. _________________ aka: neverscared! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Highlord
Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 555
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, that's exactly what makes this study such an attention-grabber, mouse. You mention that evolution involves a gene pool: this is an article about how that isn't necessary. Novel mutations do pop up in the prions, and selection pressure changing the modality of a population is very much evolution, even if no mutations leading to new traits are involved. _________________ There is a luxury to self-reproach. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mouse

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 15446 Location: under the bed
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if there are mutations in prions, then that fits with my definition of evolution. i understand that prions don't have genes, but they do have a specific order of amino acids that can be duplicated and reproduced. if you have a fixed number of specific patterns in a population, and you alter the percentage of those patterns, this, to my mind, is not evolution. it is a necessary _step_ in evolution (selection of advantageous forms) but it's not the whole thing. you don't actually get anything new, you get a change in the population proportions until (presumably) one form swamps out all the others - and then it stops.
but if you are getting changes in the forms in the population; i.e., new forms coming into existence which can then be acted on by selection - then, you're talking evolution.
to my mind. _________________ aka: neverscared! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WheelsOfConfusion

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 11134 Location: Unknown Kaddath
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| That's a good point, if new topologies aren't really generated but just an existing set of them shuffled into predominance under certain conditions, there's not really anything new coming out of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Highlord
Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 555
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
To which I'll cite Darwin's finches. New mutations aren't required for the beak sizes to shift: the variation in beak size is already present, and selection pressure shifts the modality of the population towards larger or smaller beaks. A bird suddenly evolving a corkscrew beak isn't necessary for it to be evolution in action.
Evolution is much more than just changes leading to speciation, of which mutations are a very important impetus. Just stirring the pot can lead to incredible diversity without new mutations being required due to redundancy and level of expressiveness of genes: except in the case of prions, it's due to protein-protein interactions.
I also find any discussion of information when it comes to lifeforms incredibly muddled and tangential. It's an abstraction that everybody has their own definition of. _________________ There is a luxury to self-reproach. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|