 |
Sinfest
welcome to the fest
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The Highlord
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 555
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:14 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
How does a skull make fire?
_________________
There is a luxury to self-reproach. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mouse
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 15441
Location: under the bed
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dro wrote: |
Hey mouse, just got back from the Plant & Animal Genome conference in lovely San Diego. Sorry to not look you up again... had meetings with clients the whole time. |
yeah yeah yeah - you were just afraid to face my wrath BECAUSE YOU DARED TO DISAGREE WITH ME!!!!!!!
although to be precise, i really don't know if there are new variations arising in prions - that wasn't made clear (to me, at any rate) in the article. i think i said, in like my second post that if there were new variants, then yes, i would consider it evolution. but without a source of continuing variability yadda yadda yadda.
but now you have me curious, dro - do you consider a source of new variants necessary for evolution? or is the process of selection on a fixed pool of existing forms (however that pool arose) sufficient?
_________________
aka: neverscared! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dro
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3830
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
err, can we just go back to if new variants arise in prions? The article I read said that each time a prion induces a structural change in the normal protein, the structures can vary. Some structures are common, some rare. So that sounds like new variations to me.
Here's an example to get back to your question. Stickleback fish live in the ocean, and the population has a large amount of genetic variation. After the last Ice Age, when the glaciers pulled back, some stickleback got caught in lakes all over the world. In many of the lakes, stickleback lost their armor plating, changed mating behavior, color and many other attributes. These changes happened so quickly that they are not the result of new mutations in the population, but just selection on existing genetic variation. Is this evolution? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Snorri
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 10704
Location: hiding the decline.
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mouse wrote: | | Dro wrote: |
Hey mouse, just got back from the Plant & Animal Genome conference in lovely San Diego. Sorry to not look you up again... had meetings with clients the whole time. |
yeah yeah yeah - you were just afraid to face my wrath BECAUSE YOU DARED TO DISAGREE WITH ME!!!!!!!
|
Also he thinks you're not a real person, but an advanced computer program designed to lure men into their demise.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mouse
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 15441
Location: under the bed
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dro wrote: | err, can we just go back to if new variants arise in prions? The article I read said that each time a prion induces a structural change in the normal protein, the structures can vary. Some structures are common, some rare. So that sounds like new variations to me.
Here's an example to get back to your question. Stickleback fish live in the ocean, and the population has a large amount of genetic variation. After the last Ice Age, when the glaciers pulled back, some stickleback got caught in lakes all over the world. In many of the lakes, stickleback lost their armor plating, changed mating behavior, color and many other attributes. These changes happened so quickly that they are not the result of new mutations in the population, but just selection on existing genetic variation. Is this evolution? |
well, you've got me there. i was going to say, if you put them together and they can breed, it's not evolution - but then i realized you said 'changed mating behavior'. so even if, somehow, they got put back together, they are going to behave like separate species.
of course, i _could_ weasel out by pointing out that, although they might not have needed mutations to differentiate into distinct species, they are still going to have mutations occurring, so they can continue to change.....
i was thinking about things like dogs. dogs have clearly undergone substation selection (albeit not natural) - but they are still considered all one species.
i guess it gets down to the old taxonomist's dilemma - is morphology sufficient to determine a species, or do you have to throw it into a blender and get the dna comparisons?
_________________
aka: neverscared! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Yorick
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 12065
Location: Mary's kesh
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Highlord wrote: | | How does a skull make fire? |
I can talk and type and float three feet off the ground and you're worried about making fire?
_________________
88 NPH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WheelsOfConfusion
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 11133
Location: Unknown Kaddath
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yorick wrote: | | The Highlord wrote: | | How does a skull make fire? |
I can talk and type and float three feet off the ground and you're worried about making fire? |
A talking levitating skull is exactly the kind of thing I worry about having the ability to create fires. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Usagi Miyamoto
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 2165
Location: wish you were here
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:01 am Post subject: seemed apropos |
|
|
_________________
The reward for a good life is a good life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
