Welcome to the Fest
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2011-11-21 Rrr?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sinfest Forum Index -> Sinfest
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Miss Magenta



Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 3708
Location: Resigned From Position
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
If I remember correctly, Ronald had pointed that out already about a month ago or so..
_________________
Character Chart | Terminology Dictionary | Flashback Strips
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ronald



Joined: 16 Sep 2007
Posts: 3456
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
xtf wrote:
Unrelated to the actual strip but I thought I'd share that the girl in panel 4 looks quite a bit ike Glossie

http://www.sinfest.net/archive_page.php?comicID=2633


Irrelevantly enough to anyone but me, this strip is another example of how IMHO a character's dialogue might subjectively "sound" a little better by changing a word, in this case if Monique had said "rule" instead of "conquer."

Try saying it aloud (preferably when alone, but...):

"With these pants I will rule the world!"

Sort of rolls off the tongue, right? Smooth transition from W to R to W.

Now try:

"With these pants I will conquer the world!"

See, the hard K sound disrupts the syllable flow. You kind of trip over it.

But anyway. Infinitesimal detail.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Otoh



Joined: 15 Nov 2008
Posts: 713
Location: goo.gl/tRvrs
PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Congats to Cerberus in getting one of the two recently discovered extra moons of Pluto named after him anyway, Kerberos, even if it is with the hard K sound - I mean heīs meant to be/appear hard anyways ainīt it so np Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ronald



Joined: 16 Sep 2007
Posts: 3456
PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
quoting myself:
Ronald wrote:
Didn't expect my idle comments to prompt much interest, but:

xtf wrote:
Is there a reason to think that they were programmed to be interested in him instead of acting as if they're interested in him?


There's no reason to elevate either notion above the other, really -- it's just a pair of one-off gags, after all, unless Tat reads our comments, he probably hasn't thought of Devil Androids in years -- but an Android would be more effective if she truly believed she was motivated by her own emotions. An "act" can be seen through, genuineness cannot. It would heighten the drama and arguably make the Android a more sympathetic character. Is someone who's programmed to be in love with you really such a poor substitute for someone who's not in love with you at all?

Plus the inherent ethical dilemma could conceivably make the situation crueler. The Devil would like that.

Anyway, he doesn't seem to be sending Androids on flirtation missions any more, so either way, Slick's spent that nickel.


I thought this line of discussion might be why this thread was resurrected, but apparently not. Whatever.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sinfest Forum Index -> Sinfest All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group