| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Usagi Miyamoto
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 2118
Location: through the rabbit hole
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:28 am Post subject: blue state pinkos turn fuchsia with red buttinskis |
 |
|
My guess is roughly half of the Sawant total was a protest vote by Republicans. That's based on polling for Republican candidates in the last couple of elections. And assuming that's the case, then some of the bluest electorate in America still polls less than 15% for a progressive Socialist candidate, and this race isn't a harbinger of anything to speak of for the left.
_________________
The reward for a good life is a good life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Him
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3833
Location: Strange planet
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ShadowCell wrote: | you keep ignoring the part where Sawant scored about a quarter of the vote on the friendliest possible turf in the country for a socialist. she went out and campaigned and knocked on doors and planted lawn signs and rallied and out of the hardcore leftists in Washington's 43rd district she could only get a quarter of them to vote for her. in a race with no conservative spoiler. in an election climate where we're all supposed to be sick of the Democrats and don't trust them anymore. in a political climate where we're all supposed to be so welcoming of third parties and unconventional candidates. in the wake of Occupy Wall Street. with all that going for her, why did she lose by such an embarrassingly massive margin?
that is not a sign of progress and victory. that is a sign that it's time to sit down and reevaluate the entire movement and the entire environment in which it operates, because if it can't win over more than 29% of the left, something is very wrong with it and it is going nowhere.
because--and i realize you struggle with this point--29% does not win you anything in the United States. you don't get 29% of the seats. you don't get attention. you don't get respect. call me when you can break into the forties, if not actually win an election.
that you call it a "united left list" is just further indication that you understand nothing about United States politics. |
*sigh* I'd hate to repeat myself so I won't. I try to explain how election campaign works, the issue of being outspent, the issue of being unknown going against an 18 year incumbent, the issue of running openly as a socialist, but eh you're just not getting it.
Usagi Miyamoto: Ah yes that famous conservative-socialist protest vote. I saw someone hilariously say on a comment field "she's probably a republican plant". Ah the lunacy of the two-party duopoly and it's lesser-evilism. Aside from those other issues. Yeah the Chopp campaign used their establishment position to pressure unions and other groups to support them or else they won't get any "influence". So incredibly even in a Democrat versus Socialist race the spectre of "lesser-evilism" appears, now more in it's blackmail form than it's promise form.
At least there was one union local brave enough to endorse Sawant.
_________________
'[Obama] is like a dog, running around biting peaceful people for no reason.' - Cristi Wang |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ShadowCell
Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 4449
Location: California
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if
| Quote: | | running openly as a socialist |
is an issue--as you say it is--then perhaps that means you need to sit down and think about why it might be an issue that only 29% of one of the bluest electorates in the country was willing to vote for Sawant. only 29% of the voters that should be most amicable to socialism were in fact willing to vote for it*.
'cuz if running openly as a socialist is an issue, perhaps that means there's a deeper problem than just being outspent and challenging an incumbent.
you have all the dots right in front of you and it only takes one line to connect them.
*assuming that all of those 29% of voters were in fact sincerely casting ballots for her.
**ironically, you could look to better examples than Sawant anyways. Bernie Sanders not only is a socialist, but is a socialist on a national platform. of course, he comes from a constituency that is amicable to it or at least willing to overlook it, and he has to "play ball with the politicians" in order to make himself relevant and do anything, and he has to bring home tangible benefits to his state to convince Vermonters (Vermontians? Vermontoids? Vermontese? what is the demonym for Vermont) to keep voting for him. but the end result is that he has fairly high-profile legitimate straight up political power. he's a much more convincing success story--and you'll notice that he's more convincing because he won elections. not also-ran. not 29%. not "gold star for effort." won. won reelection. won pretty commandingly. in fact, he won by roughly the same margin by which Sawant lost. why you're harping on Sawant's landslide defeat is a bit of a mystery when 2012 actually does have a socialist electoral success story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fritterdonut
Joined: 24 Jul 2012
Posts: 269
Location: Krieg ohne Hass.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sam
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 8567
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sanders is pretty socialist, but he's "socialist" in american terminology rather than what you would have to have in order to be a congressional or gubernatorial candidate for a Socialist party like SA. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sam
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 8567
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Him wrote: |
*sigh* I'd hate to repeat myself so I won't. I try to explain how election campaign works, the issue of being outspent, the issue of being unknown going against an 18 year incumbent, the issue of running openly as a socialist, but eh you're just not getting it. |
I'm not sure that's really the issue. sawant's pretty much trotskyite platform is just not going to make it here. not even in our most leftist populations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WheelsOfConfusion
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 10741
Location: Unknown Kaddath
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ShadowCell wrote: | | Sawant's landslide defeat |
That's pretty much the only way to describe it, but of course Him can't grasp the significance.
Perhaps he should come over to Washington and help out the cause by revolutionizing in Seattle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Arc Tempest
Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 4447
Location: Oregon
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nah, let him revolutionize Spokane, it'd be far more hilarious.
_________________
The older I get, the more certain I become of one thing. True and abiding cynicism is simply a form of cowardice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Him
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3833
Location: Strange planet
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2012 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Or I could pay a visit to one of the newest Socialist Alternative groups. In Mobile, Alabama.
But yes I'd love to go to Seattle some day.
_________________
'[Obama] is like a dog, running around biting peaceful people for no reason.' - Cristi Wang |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Darqcyde
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 8366
Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ken Jennings: I'll take Double Meanings for $1000.
Alex Trebek: The answer is: Willful ignorance.
Jennings: What is a major problem in instituting political reform in America and the reason Him does not understand American politics as well as he thinks he does?
Trebek: Correct!
_________________
...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
http://12ozlb.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Him
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3833
Location: Strange planet
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
So on the one hand 1) "booh! those are horrible results!"
and on the other 2)"hah! Socialism can never make it in the U.S."
And when I say it's a good result considering the circumstances go to 1) or say how much the U.S isn't europe.
Right.
_________________
'[Obama] is like a dog, running around biting peaceful people for no reason.' - Cristi Wang |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
