| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Monkey Mcdermott

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 2729
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Smooshie wrote: | . Granted, we've come a long way, but I don't think there's anything terribly wrong with the latter reason for having guns. It's only paranoia if nothing happens, right?
Anyway, that's my two cents. Feel free to disagree/call me a nutcase. |
If it didn't seem to indicate that proliferation of guns = more gun deaths, primarily innocent victims it might make sense.
Mainly because no one in america is rich enough to afford the kind of weaponry that stops f16's and drones. The success of an american revolution is almost entirely based on which side the military falls on, because forgive me if I doubt the ability of our overweight, lazy, unused to real suffering, undereducated populace to take to the hills with their ar 15's and fight off the u.s. military. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bitflipper

Joined: 09 Jul 2011 Posts: 728 Location: Here and Now
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, but, the 2nd Amendment guarantees me the right to own a frikkin' nuke, if I want it!
(Will someone please do us all the favor of shooting this down as the blatantly transparent attempt it is at derailing the discussion away from the validity of the study that Darq first posted? Thanking you in advance, --a self-averred gun-nut.) _________________ I am only a somewhat arbitrary sequence of raised and lowered voltages to which your mind insists upon assigning meaning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CTrees

Joined: 21 Jul 2006 Posts: 3619
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EDIT: yeah, as I said, I find "LOL fighter jets!" to be an infuriating strawman. To the point that it got me riled up into writing things I regret. It's not why *I* am against civilian disarmament, so I need to stop jumping in and arguing it. Sorry.
As stated earlier, self-/home-defense is my primary concern. I *do* think I should be able to have the best tool for that job, and people trying to limit my ability to defend my family with laws that won't do a damn thing to limit the capabilities of criminals? That's a hard sell. _________________ “Yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation”
yields falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
Last edited by CTrees on Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ShadowCell

Joined: 03 Aug 2008 Posts: 5275 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| seeing as how we have unmanned drones that are specifically designed to obviate the need for jackbooted thugs and in fact designed specifically to kill the exact sort of person who would meet the jackbooted thugs with an AR-15, it's not much of a strawman anymore and more of a missile launched from a robot that you can't see aimed straight at your argument's house. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Monkey Mcdermott

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 2729
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
.... _________________

Last edited by Monkey Mcdermott on Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:17 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Monkey Mcdermott

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 2729
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1. You really really cannot compare the syrian military to the U.S. military for one. We have 10 times the forces, and far far better tech and infrastructure.
2. Chris Dorner was actually a trained soldier so his ability to thwart people you would classify as better trained civilians only highlights my point. He was only one trained soldier.
3. Again, the battle of athens, Veterans vs better trained civilians, continues to highlight how important the support of the military would be for a citizen's rebellion.
4. Call it a straw man all you want, let me put it another way. The U.S. military has vastly superior firepower to every civilian gun in the states. They have access to air superiority, naval superiority and vehicles with armor that the best civilian gun on its best day would need to get exceedingly lucky to pierce. Add to this that they aren't fighting a war halfway across the globe with supply lines stretched to hell and back. Frankly, i think you overestimate your chances against a swat team with flashbangs and shotguns with that ar 15 anyway.
5. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ShadowCell

Joined: 03 Aug 2008 Posts: 5275 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
also, it should be known that Dorner evaded all those resources by hiding in a house fifty yards from their command center and not answering the door when they knocked. so unless the Argument From Dorner depends on the US military being just as toweringly incompetent as the LAPD, and unless it depends on people who fight the US military being as aware of its methods and incompetency as Dorner was of the LAPD, it still doesn't work.
Last edited by ShadowCell on Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smooshie

Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Posts: 140 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ShadowCell wrote: | | seeing as how we have unmanned drones that are specifically designed to obviate the need for jackbooted thugs and in fact designed specifically to kill the exact sort of person who would meet the jackbooted thugs with an AR-15, it's not much of a strawman anymore and more of a missile launched from a robot that you can't see aimed straight at your argument's house. |
I'm not really sure I can grasp the reasoning behind nobody removing the executive branch's ability to terminate civilians that have not been convicted of any crimes. I thought that was the CIA's job. _________________ If at first you don't succeed [in persuading or explaining something to me], then try and try again.
I love you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darqcyde

Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 9086 Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.
|
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Smooshie wrote: | | ShadowCell wrote: | | seeing as how we have unmanned drones that are specifically designed to obviate the need for jackbooted thugs and in fact designed specifically to kill the exact sort of person who would meet the jackbooted thugs with an AR-15, it's not much of a strawman anymore and more of a missile launched from a robot that you can't see aimed straight at your argument's house. |
I'm not really sure I can grasp the reasoning behind nobody removing the executive branch's ability to terminate civilians that have not been convicted of any crimes. I thought that was the CIA's job. |
Whenever there'a decision made by a business, government, or any type of organization that simply seems to defy logic, even for it's constitutes, just remember, that somebody, somewhere, is probably benefiting from the outcomes of that decision. _________________
...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
http://12ozlb.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kenshiro
Joined: 04 Oct 2012 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Every person should have the right to live within a nation and/or state that most closely coincides with their preferred way of life and/or preferred laws or lack of laws. _________________ The question of our day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dogen

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 9323 Location: Bellingham, WA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
That seems like a swell, pie-in-the-sky idea. Not everyone has the means to move to such a state - assuming a state that matches them exists - nor is ideological match the only thing that might bind them to a location. Family, jobs, school, or even health care may make them relatively place-bound. I have a friend who loves WA, but has to move back to OH because she has an extremely rare heart condition and the guy who coined the name and is the leading expert on it happens to practice near her childhood home. So the ideological homology of her ideas and the state is probably secondary to her desire to get proper care. _________________ "Worse comes to worst, my people come first, but my tribe lives on every country on earth. I’ll do anything to protect them from hurt, the human race is what I serve." - Baba Brinkman |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sam

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 8840
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kenshiro wrote: | | Every person should have the right to live within a nation and/or state that most closely coincides with their preferred way of life and/or preferred laws or lack of laws. |
My preferred way of life and preferred laws is to be a nation of savage conquerors who consider all land to be rightfully ours and outsiders to be unworthy of anything but slave labor and so our most sacrosanct way of life is to mobilize for endless war and take every other experimental ideology land over and put the population to work for us and remind our vassals that if they don't like it they can leave. at least as long as other nations exist. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sam

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 8840
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| alternate answer: this rights proposal isn't worth an inch of land on this planet. in most cases i would say it's the responsibility of an ethical world to prevent most ideologies from having even a square foot of soil. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dogen

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 9323 Location: Bellingham, WA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Amen to that. _________________ "Worse comes to worst, my people come first, but my tribe lives on every country on earth. I’ll do anything to protect them from hurt, the human race is what I serve." - Baba Brinkman |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kenshiro
Joined: 04 Oct 2012 Posts: 47
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|