welcome to the fest
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

MRA 101
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 32, 33, 34  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sinfest Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Him



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 4191
Location: On edge

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://manboobz.com/
_________________
A cigarette is the perfect type of a perfect pleasure. It is exquisite, and it leaves one unsatisfied. What more can one want? ~Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sam



Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9556

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Part of what you can expect after swallowing the red pill is people incessantly asking about why a “slut is a slut” and a “stud is a stud,” saying it is a double standard and then 9 times out of 10 calling you a misogynist.

I keep finding analogous ways to describe why the above is the way it is and how it is simply bad reasoning to think otherwise.

Consider the following scenario:

A man walks into a car dealership to buy a vehicle and is greeted by a car salesman.

The potential buyer is shown around the floor and is given the chance to look at various models, is given their specifications, gets a chance to sit in a couple of the models and is even given the opportunity to test drive a couple of the vehicles.

The buyer selects two models and takes them both out on the road to see how the drive and to get a better feel for them.

After returning from the second test drive they both go into the car salesman’s office to discuss purchasing a vehicle.

One vehicle is a brand new 2013 model that has less than 5,000 clicks, no dents or scratches, in perfect working order, has all the bells and whistles and comes with a 5 year warranty. It costs $25,000.

The second vehicle is a used 2009 version or the same vehicle, has 130,000 clicks, has a dent in the bumper, less fuel efficient, doesn’t have a leather interior and only comes with a 3 year warranty. It too costs $25,000.

The buyer is perplexed.

“You want to sell me a vehicle that has 26 times the mileage, 2 years less on the warranty, a couple dents and is lacking some of the details I want in a car. Tell me again why I am paying the exact same price for it?”

“Well, because all cars a created equal” the car salesman retorts. “Who are you to scoff at the thought of getting less of what you want for your hard earned money. Who are you to impose your societal expectations and social conditions on this vehicle? You’re obviously projecting! You’re obviously not a real man! You and your double standards make me sick”

“Well if I’m spending my hard earned money on something – I want to get what I want. I don’t want a subpar vehicle with more mileage, more dents and less of a warranty. And who are you to tell me what I should like? Who are you to tell me what is valuable? Who are you to try and impose your capitalistic expectations on me? I’ll buy whatever vehicle I see fit!”

Society (on the whole) is the used car salesman.

A slut is a used vehicle -- or maybe more aptly a used-up vehicle -- and society is attempting to sell it to you for the same price as a new vehicle.

A car that has been driven around the block a few times really isn’t a big deal. A car that has driven across the country – twice – is much less desirable if you are spending the same amount of money to purchase it.

Society – particularly feminists -- wants you to believe:

= = > Used cars (sluts) are as good as new cars.

= = > Used cars (sluts) should cost the same as new cars.

= = > There is no intrinsic difference between the two.

= = > A used car (sluts) have the same market value as a new car (female who has had only a couple sexual partners)

Now before you get your knickers in a knot – I am not saying women/sluts are only as valuable as cars. I understand NAWALT but it seems in this day and age sluts are the rule, not the exception.

If you’re spending your heard earned money (commitment) and you want to ensure you’re getting the most bang for your buck – no pun intended -- why would men value something that has been through the ringer over something that is brand new or gently used?

In fact, human beings desire brand new things over used things. Apart from things that are considered collectibles -- 99.9% of the time the value for something used goes down -- not up.

There is less glory in walking an old path than there is in blazing a new one of your own. There is value in scarcity. And 18+ girls with under 5 notches are quite scarce this day and age.

Thoughts?

EDIT: NO AMOUNT OF DOWNVOTES OR WHITEKNIGHTING WILL PREVENT US FROM SPREADING THE RED PILL MESSAGE IN THIS SUBREDDIT. THIS PLACE WILL SURVIVE YOUR ONSLAUGHT AND YOU WILL BE DEFEATED. MANGINAS AND FEMINISTS WILL NEVER PREVAIL.

IN FACT -- DOWNVOTES ARE A BADGE OF HONOR. SHOWS YOUR HAMSTERS ARE SPINNING AND YOUR FEATHERS HAVE BEEN RUFFLED

ENJOY YOUR BLUE PILLS

MORE EVIDENCE AS TO WHY SLUTS WOULD MAKE A BAD WIFE OR GIRLFRIEND
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadowCell



Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 6080
Location: California

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh god poe's laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sam



Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9556

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

poe's lawl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stripeypants



Joined: 24 Feb 2013
Posts: 3429
Location: Land of the Grumpuses

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, so the red pill is some fucked up version of game theory? I can not find a single link about it that explains it in any kind of concise way.

(By fucked up version of game theory, I mean, "Hey we're actually participating in a game world and women are NPCs!")
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sam



Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9556

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red Pill is this thing where a bunch of MRA type dudes are like "see feminism and female privilege has created a world that we have to fight back against to get back our natural male needs and it's like we're plugged into the matrix and can't see what's really going on but you have to wake up to the truth of misandry running our lives"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Finnegan



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 1080
Location: in that cool mountain air, on an appalachian trail

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

looking at that red pill subreddit made me physically ill. granted I was feeling a bit unwell to begin with but that undoubtedly is what pushed me over the edge.

also, sam, no offense but perhaps just post a link in the future. I would prefer to see what actual forum members have to say and be able to engage them in conversation rather than see the thread full of the regurgitated idiocy of the worst of what the internet has to offer.
_________________
Formerly Green_Finn

hey! rock bottom's not that bad
we've got glow-in-the-dark fish down here that's rad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Black Kitty



Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 704
Location: Under your bed.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seriously nauseating. Is that where you're getting all this shit, Sam?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mouse



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 17282
Location: under the bed

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sam wrote:
I created thas subreddit for men interested in using the psychopathy/narcissism/maquiavelism on females as the main strategy for casual sex. Anything related one night stands, short-term relationships goes


ok, i was thinking this was all just a joke until i came to this one, because i know you would never spell 'machiavellianism' that badly even as a joke.
_________________
aka: neverscared!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stripeypants



Joined: 24 Feb 2013
Posts: 3429
Location: Land of the Grumpuses

PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sad I thought Sam was being hyperbolic too, but I figured what it was based on had to be god-awful too.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mouse



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 17282
Location: under the bed

PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes, but sometimes it's a surprise to find out how deep the hole really is.
_________________
aka: neverscared!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Finnegan



Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 1080
Location: in that cool mountain air, on an appalachian trail

PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mouse wrote:
Sam wrote:
I created thas subreddit for men interested in using the psychopathy/narcissism/maquiavelism on females as the main strategy for casual sex. Anything related one night stands, short-term relationships goes


ok, i was thinking this was all just a joke until i came to this one, because i know you would never spell 'machiavellianism' that badly even as a joke.


wow, that was so mangled I didn't even recognize what it was supposed to be, I had just skipped right over it.
_________________
Formerly Green_Finn

hey! rock bottom's not that bad
we've got glow-in-the-dark fish down here that's rad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lasairfiona



Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9702
Location: I have to be somewhere? ::runs around frantically::

PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 2:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who the fuck wants to have sex with a virgin? Seriously? Is this some sort of fetish? Because otherwise the religious explanation makes WAY WAY WAY more sense.
_________________
Before God created Las he pondered on all the aspects a woman might have, he considered which ones would look good super-inflated and which ones to leave alone.
After much deliberation he gave her a giant comfort zone. - Michael
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lasairfiona



Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9702
Location: I have to be somewhere? ::runs around frantically::

PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 2:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually the car example could be used for AGE, not number of sex partners. I mean, if we really wanted to make that metaphor make sense somewhere.
_________________
Before God created Las he pondered on all the aspects a woman might have, he considered which ones would look good super-inflated and which ones to leave alone.
After much deliberation he gave her a giant comfort zone. - Michael
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stripeypants



Joined: 24 Feb 2013
Posts: 3429
Location: Land of the Grumpuses

PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 2:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lasairfiona wrote:
Who the fuck wants to have sex with a virgin? Seriously? Is this some sort of fetish? Because otherwise the religious explanation makes WAY WAY WAY more sense.


People who have no sexual skills but want their partners to think they do.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sinfest Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 32, 33, 34  Next
Page 2 of 34

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group