welcome to the fest
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

2013-07-06 Spot the Creepy Pornsick Stalker Dude
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sinfest Forum Index -> Sinfest
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dennis J. Squidbunny



Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 3720
Location: AUSTRALIA YOU FAKIR

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

merest wrote:
Monkey Mcdermott wrote:
God im tired of you assholes.

Do you think anything you say hasn't already been said here before?

Why the fuck are you making everyone reiterate their refutation of your stances over and over again.

Are you all really so dim that it didn't sink in the first ten times?

Go the fuck away, i'm sure guest would like some people to commiserate with over at the slymepit forum.


Relaxation drills might, with perseverance, enable you to speak without drawing your lips apart in a sneer. The lewd and compulsive gesture documented in your signature seems more problematic. However, as it appears to be a voluntary variant on Tourette's syndrome, a useful exercise might be to say 'fuck you' in gradually calmer tones. When you feel ready, you could substitute for it milder phrases like 'damn your eyes, sir', 'out, varlet, from my sight', and, finally, 'how long will you abuse our sufferance?' The same could be repeated with your lewd hand-signal, until, by a series of transformations, you end up courteously saluting your opponent.

I feel that I have done my bit for the betterment of mankind today, and find it an oddly pleasant sensation. I should do this more often.


quelle suprise, this is the most glorious of misbended posts. Supreme condescending mixed up with some surreal typing/speaking metaphor train accident. Speak without drawing his lips apart in a sneer? Type without fingering his... fingers... in a sneer?

Varlet! Sufferance! Combined with the polite self-handshake, the feeling of an oddly pleasant sensation and you have confirmed in my mind that you are actually a spambot designed to bilk first year theatre studies students gone rogue.

Avaunt, Falstaffatron! Sew yon healing seeds uponce our feted browes, sirrah!

EXEUNT DOT EXE
_________________
"Eight hundred pounds of nitro, his boots are thunder as he plays."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dennis J. Squidbunny



Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 3720
Location: AUSTRALIA YOU FAKIR

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2% BODY FAT PHD TOP 5% FANFIC RIDICULATION TOO STRONG A
_________________
"Eight hundred pounds of nitro, his boots are thunder as he plays."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monkey Mcdermott



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3315

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm really more of a "draw my unibrow down into a scowl" kind of guy.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
merest



Joined: 15 May 2011
Posts: 325

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ShadowCell wrote:
what, that you missed the point? or rather, you "missed" the point? that your constant stressing that "well there are so many qualifications there can't possibly be that many creepy pornsick stalker dudes" is in fact a variation of blaming the victim, precisely because it puts the onus on the victim for worrying about "something so rare"? that you're just reiterating Rothide's "it's going to happen anyway so why worry about it" point? [etc]


Ah! That's where you have been misreading, or I miscommunicating (quite possibly), or some combination. To say that something is more unusual because having a set of criteria that are more difficult than were the connotative bar set lower is not to say that it is not worth worrying about _at all._ Nowhere did I say otherwise. As a purely logical distinction, it is probably rather cold comfort, if anything; like someone who has lost a child receiving a letter of condolence. A little reassuring, yes; but not in any significant way, given the facts.

Anyway, I was simply struck by the specific description of the group that the Patriarchy Matrix told Monique that she should be paranoid about. 'Well,' I thought, 'that's rather specific. I wonder if there are meant to be causative factors between the four properties, or if the Matrix is inadvertently doing itself a disservice by describing an unnecessarily restricted group - one could at least double the members of this class (and also the paranoia) by omitting 'pornsick', 'dude', 'creepy', or 'stalker.'"

Now that I've cleared this up to my satisfaction, I shall see you next thread. Until then, to echo your own signings off, I shall paraphrase the offensive and quaintly stilted words of the Progs of the video game Alpha Centauri - "Defiance: your tribe."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadowCell



Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 6053
Location: California

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

in other words, you're trying to backpedal without having to change a word of what you say.

good to know! i will be sure to remind you of this as yet another one of your failures in "the next thread."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Felgraf



Joined: 10 Jul 2012
Posts: 720

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Monkey Mcdermott wrote:
I'm really more of a "draw my unibrow down into a scowl" kind of guy.


Those eyebrows....




/Yes, I know the character didn't have a unibrow, but it was close.
_________________
"No, but evil is still being --Is having reason-- Being reasonable! Mousie understands? Is always being reason. Is punishing world for not being... Like in head. Is always reason. World should be different, is reason."
-Ed, from Digger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadowCell



Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 6053
Location: California

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

it wants to be a unibrow

look at the two halves of it, straining to be together
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monkey Mcdermott



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3315

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I feel like it needs to be said, that the number of people clutching their pearls (and man i really like that phrase and am probably going to use it for EVAR NOW) about the gif in my sig pretty much insures that it will never go away.....ever.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
merest



Joined: 15 May 2011
Posts: 325

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ShadowCell wrote:
in other words, you're trying to backpedal without having to change a word of what you say.

good to know! i will be sure to remind you of this as yet another one of your failures in "the next thread."


You've not quoted a word of what I've said, nor engaged with any of my remarks. Anyone can employ that tactic - but it is one of sophistry, not dialectic. Remind all you wish, and I shall remind you of that in turn.

What is that finger-flipping sig from, anyway? It looks like a 1950s television show.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShadowCell



Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 6053
Location: California

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

and now we settle for rank dishonesty! be a little more original, man.

and weren't you leaving? i don't see it being "next thread" yet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ricia



Joined: 19 Feb 2013
Posts: 78

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rune wrote:
stripeypants wrote:
"Here is how not to be a rapist, and how not to appear to be a rapist when you don't mena to, and here is how to tell non rapists from rapists"


Does seem like that would solve both problems, wouldn't it?


As somebody who's seen both sides and experienced one personally, I support this idea too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monkey Mcdermott



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3315

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

merest wrote:
ShadowCell wrote:
in other words, you're trying to backpedal without having to change a word of what you say.

good to know! i will be sure to remind you of this as yet another one of your failures in "the next thread."


You've not quoted a word of what I've said, nor engaged with any of my remarks. Anyone can employ that tactic - but it is one of sophistry, not dialectic. Remind all you wish, and I shall remind you of that in turn.

What is that finger-flipping sig from, anyway? It looks like a 1950s television show.


That's none of your concern and I'll thank you to keep your nose out of my affairs.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
diagram12345



Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Monkey Mcdermott wrote:
merest wrote:
ShadowCell wrote:
in other words, you're trying to backpedal without having to change a word of what you say.

good to know! i will be sure to remind you of this as yet another one of your failures in "the next thread."


You've not quoted a word of what I've said, nor engaged with any of my remarks. Anyone can employ that tactic - but it is one of sophistry, not dialectic. Remind all you wish, and I shall remind you of that in turn.

What is that finger-flipping sig from, anyway? It looks like a 1950s television show.


That's none of your concern and I'll thank you to keep your nose out of my affairs.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic4mEc_6JQ8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rothide



Joined: 14 Jul 2012
Posts: 852

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Monkey Mcdermott wrote:
merest wrote:
ShadowCell wrote:
in other words, you're trying to backpedal without having to change a word of what you say.

good to know! i will be sure to remind you of this as yet another one of your failures in "the next thread."


You've not quoted a word of what I've said, nor engaged with any of my remarks. Anyone can employ that tactic - but it is one of sophistry, not dialectic. Remind all you wish, and I shall remind you of that in turn.

What is that finger-flipping sig from, anyway? It looks like a 1950s television show.


That's none of your concern and I'll thank you to keep your nose out of my affairs.


It's mr. Rogers doing a song about counting, or about what your fingers are called, one of those, it wasn't flipping off the bird intentionally though.
_________________
The Angry Asshat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rothide



Joined: 14 Jul 2012
Posts: 852

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

diagram12345 wrote:
Monkey Mcdermott wrote:
merest wrote:
ShadowCell wrote:
in other words, you're trying to backpedal without having to change a word of what you say.

good to know! i will be sure to remind you of this as yet another one of your failures in "the next thread."


You've not quoted a word of what I've said, nor engaged with any of my remarks. Anyone can employ that tactic - but it is one of sophistry, not dialectic. Remind all you wish, and I shall remind you of that in turn.

What is that finger-flipping sig from, anyway? It looks like a 1950s television show.


That's none of your concern and I'll thank you to keep your nose out of my affairs.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic4mEc_6JQ8


Wow, I would have personally continued the gif to show the finger twirls, adds even more comedy to it.
_________________
The Angry Asshat.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Sinfest Forum Index -> Sinfest All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 6 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group