 |
Sinfest welcome to the fest
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Agamemnon

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 907 Location: Studying somewhere. Or at least that's where I should be.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:24 pm Post subject: Pirates of the Pirates of the Caribbean? |
|
|
Was "Pirates" Pirated?
By Natalie Finn
Wed Jul 12, 2:11 AM ET
E-Online
How does one put the brakes on a $654 million juggernaut?
A screenwriter who says that he had pirates on the brain long before Johnny Depp inserted his first gold tooth is going to try.
Royce Mathew has sued the Walt Disney Co., Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Jerry Bruckheimer Films, Touchstone Home Video and 24 other related enterprises that had a stake in the 2003 blockbuster Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl for copyright infringement.
In his complaint, available online at TMZ.com, the Florida resident claims that over the last two decades he "created and wrote a number of original works including drawings, screenplays, outlines, blueprints, storyboards, and other original materials which included multimedia works, which he generally entitled SNPM, standing for Supernatural Pirate Movie."
Just a working title, we presume.
He also stated that he eventually filed his drawings, which included sketches of a pirate ship that he named the Black Pearl, as well as a blueprint and screenplay draft for his ghostly pirate caper, with the U.S. Copyright Office. Mathew also says that he created characters called Will Turner and Elizabeth, along with an eccentric pirate captain and a cursed crew.
There was no immediate comment from either Disney or Bruckheimer on the complaint.
Mathew is seeking unspecified monetary damages and an injunction prohibiting the 28 defendants from publicly displaying the movie (i.e. through DVD rentals, online downloading, soundtrack and merchandise sales, network broadcasts, etc.). Curiously, Mathew's suit was filed last Friday, just before the first of two planned sequels, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, blasted the box office wide open, taking in a record $135.6 million and pretty much guaranteeing that this franchise is going to end up in billion-dollar territory.
Per the complaint, Mathew supposedly showed his early sketches and other materials to "a variety of employees and agents" of the named defendants, both privately and through the William Morris Agency and Creative Artists Agency, with the hope that his project would get the go-ahead. Alas, matey, he was told that his idea wouldn't make a "financially rewarding project."
But despite the fact that Disney has been linked with a certain swashbuckling theme park ride called Pirates of the Caribbean since 1968, Mathew felt that The Curse of the Black Pearl pilfered plot lines, event sequencing, characters, dialogue, mood, setting, pace, concept and its overall tone from his Supernatural Pirate Movie. Arrgh.
Although the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court's Central District of California does not mention Dead Man's Chest or the upcoming At World's End, slated for a May 2007 release, it asks the judge to issue an injunction against The Curse of the Black Pearl and "other infringing works."
Could that include the newly refurbished Pirates ride at Disneyland and Disney World, which since June 26 has featured animatronic Captain Jack Sparrow figures and a story line that's more in sync with the hit films?
While fellow codefendants Disneyland International and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts could theoretically be in for a fight, they've got on their side almost 30 years of history and one of the most powerful multimedia companies in the world. We're going to place a bet on the strength of Disney and, well, let it ride.
***********************
My question....why did it take 3 years to file the lawsuit? If this guy has dated material filed with the Copyright office, then wouldn't this be pretty slam dunk? _________________ -Agamemnon.....but you can call me Jake.
P: They don't know we know they know we know. And Joey, you can't say anything!
J: Couldn't if I wanted to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
juggernautxug

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 355 Location: Windsor Ontario Canada
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guy's going to get a settlement at best. maybe a life-time pass to all the disney parks lmao
*edit
almost forgot.... I guess this guy could also go after digital playground for this movie 18+ http://digitalplayground.com/storeproduct.php?pid=725 _________________ I can swear there ain't no heaven but I pray there ain't no hell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drui

Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 541 Location: 'Jersey :}
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Some people sure know how to waste their 15 minutes of fame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoySetsFire

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 374 Location: Rex Kwan Doe enthusiast
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it doesn't matter, legally, that Disney has had that ride in its park for almost 40 years. the idea for the movie/characters/plotlines are separate from that. the doesn't even have to have a recognized trademark from the patent office, as long as he can prove that he created those names and such before Disney did. and he sounds like the kind of person that would have good documentation for all his stuff.
he's going to make a boatload, har har har, of cash on this. it's just a matter of time before he gets a big fat check of some sort, whether it be court-ordered, or disney settling out of court. if i were him, i wouldn't settle for a declared dollar amount. i'd hold out for a percentage instead. that's how keanu became a billionaire. he took a percentage for his Matrix work, instead of a fee. _________________ On Twitter
D.C. Live Tracks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lasairfiona

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 9611 Location: I have to be somewhere? ::runs around frantically::
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If, IF! the guy has had his material stolen, the best he is going to get is an out of court settlement. Disney is a very large and ruthless company and this wouldn't be the first time plots have been stolen but I say the guy is full of shit. Waiting this long for a suit can only mean he just had the damn idea. _________________ Before God created Las he pondered on all the aspects a woman might have, he considered which ones would look good super-inflated and which ones to leave alone.
After much deliberation he gave her a giant comfort zone. - Michael |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Black Kitty

Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 704 Location: Under your bed.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well put, Drui. ^^;
Regardless of the outcome, what does he think he's going to do after this? Can he really think that any company will ever want to look at his concepts again? _________________ Live to laugh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Agamemnon

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 907 Location: Studying somewhere. Or at least that's where I should be.
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If the settlement is large enough, I could see early retirement being a really good option. _________________ -Agamemnon.....but you can call me Jake.
P: They don't know we know they know we know. And Joey, you can't say anything!
J: Couldn't if I wanted to. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 10429
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Black Kitty wrote: | | Regardless of the outcome, what does he think he's going to do after this? Can he really think that any company will ever want to look at his concepts again? |
what 'cause he might sue them if they steal from him? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Uncle Taylorbell

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 3191 Location: Northern England
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Michael wrote: | | Black Kitty wrote: | | Regardless of the outcome, what does he think he's going to do after this? Can he really think that any company will ever want to look at his concepts again? |
what 'cause he might sue them if they steal from him? |
I think what B_K and Drui are saying is that, if someone steals from you, you should just shut up and not contest it 'cos like wow or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TIAB

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 482
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think the point was more that, as superficial as hollywood is, most movie studios are just going to see this guy as a liability, as someone looking out for himself and not the studio's best interest. His timing is highly questionable as well. And if he did have contact with a few Disney employee in which ideas were shared, who's to say that it didn't go the other way around? It could have been a well thought out get-rich-quick scheme. Either way, it would make any studio weary to trust him. Just simply not a good first impression that he's making. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael

Joined: 09 Jul 2006 Posts: 10429
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
if he's a fraud he won't care and if it's real it won't matter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PsycoMonkey

Joined: 12 Jul 2006 Posts: 447
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| im so confused |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mouse

Joined: 10 Jul 2006 Posts: 15446 Location: under the bed
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i don't know - he's suing because he came up with a character named "elizabeth"? any idea how many elizabeths there are in this world?
he probably came up with soemthing pirate-oriented, and has now decided that anyone else that does something pirate-oriented stole it from him.
we will see (i suppose) what was actually on file with the patent office. _________________ aka: neverscared! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Just_A_Girl

Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 527 Location: Lost in America
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| In today's lawsuit happy world, this incident doesn't really come as a surprise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darqcyde

Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 9086 Location: A false vacuum abiding in ignorance.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BoySetsFire wrote: | it doesn't matter, legally, that Disney has had that ride in its park for almost 40 years. the idea for the movie/characters/plotlines are separate from that. the doesn't even have to have a recognized trademark from the patent office, as long as he can prove that he created those names and such before Disney did. and he sounds like the kind of person that would have good documentation for all his stuff.
he's going to make a boatload, har har har, of cash on this. it's just a matter of time before he gets a big fat check of some sort, whether it be court-ordered, or disney settling out of court. if i were him, i wouldn't settle for a declared dollar amount. i'd hold out for a percentage instead. that's how keanu became a billionaire. he took a percentage for his Matrix work, instead of a fee. |
Um this may be of small note, but Jack Sparrow's appearance is pretty damn close to that of the pirate captain on the original ride. _________________
...if a single leaf holds the eye, it will be as if the remaining leaves were not there.
http://12ozlb.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|